Avatar is bad news for movie lovers
While the world struggles to find new adjectives to describe the wonderfulosity of James Cameron's 3D epic, Avatar, the more sober amongst us reckon that film lovers should be afraid - very afraid - of what its runaway success means.
Are millions queuing round the block to see it several times because it's a great film or because it uses a desperately-clunky technology to produce a 3D illusion? Would it have knocked Titanic off the top spot of all time if there had been no 3D effects?
No it wouldn't. Take away the 3D hype and it's nothing but a tired remake of Pocahontas with a load of lumpen environmental mumbo jumbo bolted on top.
Would Citizen Kane be a better film in 3D, or color? No it bloody wouldn't. Kane is a great film as it is. Colorizing it or adding a Dolby Surround soundtrack would add nothing, 3D likewise.
Technology is no substitute for a great story and script, proper characterizations, skilled direction and cinematography.
It's hard enough for new talent to get their movies made as it is.
Now the Hollywood suits will be demanding that every movie comes in 3D, meaning what money is available will be spread across a handful of mega movies rather than hundreds of boring old 2D ones.
please read the rest of the article at the following link. (As a respect to original article and its copyrights, I don't want to put the whole article here.. but read it, argument is seriously valid)http://www.tgdaily.com/unbalanced/48209 ... gle+Reader
Letting out a secret, I still didn't watch Avatar. I just can't make up my mind in walking to the cinema just to watch an animation flick. Lately I'm getting sick of all the visual effect filled films.. sometimes I feel waste money + time @ cinema. (yeah.. call me a socialist now!)
I still find God Father 1 a great movie despite it has been shot 1972 and rudimentary visual effects. I watched it only ones (abour 6 years ago). But still I can narrate the plot quite accurately. That's how big that movie has impacted on me.